<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Logical &#38; Critical Thinking</title> <atom:link href="http://logical-critical-thinking.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 02:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Human Cognition vs AI (artificial intelligence)</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/human-cognition-vs-ai-artificial-intelligence/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/human-cognition-vs-ai-artificial-intelligence/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:56:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=722</guid> <description><![CDATA[What is stopping us from creating artificial intelligence known as AI? What is it about human intellect and cognition that separates us from a computer? There lies an inherent problem which is philosophical in nature. This is the subjective matter of knowledge of self and experience. This is a problem because aside from an individuals [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/human-cognition-vs-ai-artificial-intelligence/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Could A Priori Knowledge Prove a God Exists?</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/could-a-priori-knowledge-prove-a-god-exists/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/could-a-priori-knowledge-prove-a-god-exists/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:41:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=718</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is a very serious article for me; I take logic and critical thinking as a thing of great import. Unlike some other articles where I write it from a perspective of teacher to student, this topic runs in the realm of students talking over a topic with no teacher in the room. Let&#8217;s all [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/could-a-priori-knowledge-prove-a-god-exists/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>12</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>A Priori Knowledge</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/a-priori-knowledge/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/a-priori-knowledge/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:03:09 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=716</guid> <description><![CDATA[A priori Definition A priori is a philosophy term used to describe a type of knowledge. A priori means &#8220;from the earlier&#8221;, but this is kind of obvious because it sounds like the word &#8220;prior&#8221;. A priori knowledge is something you can figure out on your own with no research. A priori knowledge needs no [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/a-priori-knowledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Words of Wisdom and Philosophical Quotes</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/words-of-wisdom-and-philosophical-quotes/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/words-of-wisdom-and-philosophical-quotes/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 03:14:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=713</guid> <description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s some good philosophical quotes and words of wisdom. Sometimes its good to ponder these for self help or just mental exercise. Here we go: Give a man a mask and he will show his true face. Oscar Wilde A man with one watch knows what time it is; a man with two watches is never [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/words-of-wisdom-and-philosophical-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Intolerance toward the intolerant</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/intolerance-toward-the-intolerant/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/intolerance-toward-the-intolerant/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 02:22:09 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=709</guid> <description><![CDATA[Is it hypocritical to be intolerant toward the intolerant? I think the answer is &#8216;no&#8217; and here&#8217;s why. Tolerance is a noun while tolerant is an adjective. However the true essence of tolerance and being tolerant is a verb, it is an action one integrates into their daily life. If a person is tolerant in regards to intolerance [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/intolerance-toward-the-intolerant/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Does Free Will Exist?</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/does-free-will-exist/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/does-free-will-exist/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:17:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=707</guid> <description><![CDATA[I think most people want to feel like they have control over their life. Feeling out of control without limits is terrifying. Skydiving might be enjoyable in that there is a limit, the parachute. This gives you a level of control in a situation where you otherwise have no control; like falling at 120 mph [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/does-free-will-exist/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What is Moral?</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/what-is-moral/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/what-is-moral/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:07:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=700</guid> <description><![CDATA[What is moral? When faced with a scenario or set of choices how do we know what is moral? It&#8217;s about to get deep, real deep. I&#8217;m gonna pick apart the brain and analyze why a thing is moral or immoral. There might even be some grotesque over-analyzation of thought patterns and over detailed wording [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/what-is-moral/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argumentum-ad-ignorantiam/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argumentum-ad-ignorantiam/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:22:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=696</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam is where one assumes a thing is true if it cannot be proven to be false or that a thing is false if it cannot proven to be true. In both directions a fallacy has occurred because in the absence of evidence no conclusion can be drawn. If these arguments were logical and compelling cases [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argumentum-ad-ignorantiam/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Top 5 Logical Fallacies</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/top-5-logical-fallacies/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/top-5-logical-fallacies/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:19:32 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=689</guid> <description><![CDATA[There are tons of logical fallacies out there, so many that it can seem overwhelming to learn them. Among the mountains of fallacies facing us are several that seem to come up often. These fallacies also help make a good foundation to help us understand more obscure or harder to understand logical fallacies. So here [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/top-5-logical-fallacies/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Bandwagon Fallacy</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/bandwagon-fallacy/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/bandwagon-fallacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:40:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=684</guid> <description><![CDATA[A Bandwagon Fallacy is when a statement is assumed to be logically valid because of popular support. Bandwagon Fallacy Examples Bandwagon Fallacy Example 1 &#8220;Does god exist? Several billion people can&#8217;t be wrong!&#8221; Yes they can, in fact 100% of humanity could be wrong, there was a time when no one understood disease thinking it [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/bandwagon-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Desire for Learning</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/the-desire-for-learning/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/the-desire-for-learning/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:08:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=678</guid> <description><![CDATA[I love learning and hope that if you don&#8217;t that I can convince you to love it too. I never stopped learning after college, in fact my learning increased. My raw, unquenched, and enduring thirst for learning and knowledge seems to be limited only by physical weaknesses. I get excited about learning because I feel a [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/the-desire-for-learning/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Confirmation Bias</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/confirmation-bias/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/confirmation-bias/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:48:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=674</guid> <description><![CDATA[Confirmation bias is the tendency to favor evidence and information which already supports previously held ideas or beliefs. The human mind will trick itself into protecting currently held beliefs regardless of evidence. In 2003, psychologist John Jost, analyzed over 80 studies, topping more than 20,000 people. The findings of such studies, as well as others, support the presence [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/confirmation-bias/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Why Indoctrination is so Effective</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/why-indoctrination-is-so-effective/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/why-indoctrination-is-so-effective/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 04:28:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=669</guid> <description><![CDATA[From simple clothing styles to the Nazi Youth movement one thing is common, indoctrinated behaviors prevail. Across all cultures and time, that humans can remember, indoctrination has guided and shaped human lives. Let&#8217;s look at how indoctrination might have originated and why it is so effective. Indoctrination for Evolutionary Survival Somewhere along our evolutionary path [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/why-indoctrination-is-so-effective/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Indoctrination is Bad</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/indoctrination-is-bad/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/indoctrination-is-bad/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:08:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=666</guid> <description><![CDATA[You must do as I say, you must be one of us! One of us! One of us! Actually, I don&#8217;t want you to blindly follow anything. This often is the mantra of many ideologies and it is indoctrination. Let&#8217;s look at indoctrination and why it is so bad. Indoctrination is a form of teaching that differs from [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/indoctrination-is-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Fear and Rejection of New Ideas</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/fear-and-rejection-of-new-ideas/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/fear-and-rejection-of-new-ideas/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:42:13 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=661</guid> <description><![CDATA[I have just been informed that I could have charges brought against me. For what you ask? Well for simply making this site. Yes, you heard that right. I am not actually gonna be charged with anything so don&#8217;t worry, but this was the reaction of someone that saw my site. Her literal words were [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/fear-and-rejection-of-new-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Philosophical Logic</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/philosophical-logic/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/philosophical-logic/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:52:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=658</guid> <description><![CDATA[Philosophical Logic is  concerned with the study of argument, meaning, and truth. It is very familiar with informal logic in that it can touch several different systems of logic. This logic and informal logic both have a similar leaning in that they seek to figure out arguments, statements, and beliefs however is possible. For me [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/philosophical-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Mathematical Logic</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/mathematical-logic/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/mathematical-logic/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:33:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=656</guid> <description><![CDATA[Mathematical logic is mathematical in nature. Mathematical logic is divided into the categories of set theory, model theory, recursion theory, and proof theory. Helpful Links Set Theory Model Theory Recursion Theory Proof Theory &#60; Back to Logic Page]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/mathematical-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Modal Logic</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/modal-logic/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/modal-logic/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:31:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=653</guid> <description><![CDATA[Modal Logic is an extension of more formal logic. It is an attempt to use modal elements to form logic structures that are not absolute. For example terms such as probability, possibilities, necessity are elements of modal logic. Modal Logic Examples Peaceful discourse is a probable element of  middle east peace. Peaceful discourse is a [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/modal-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Predicate Logic</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/predicate-logic/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/predicate-logic/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:54:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=652</guid> <description><![CDATA[Predicate logic is a series of formal logic systems with a defined logic alphabet. These formal systems are first order logic, second order logic, many order logic, and infinitive logic. Predicate logic is unique because of the symbols, alphabet and variables used to express relations between premises and conclusions. This is a pretty hardcore and [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/predicate-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Syllogistic Logic</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/syllogistic-logic/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/syllogistic-logic/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:48:41 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=648</guid> <description><![CDATA[Syllogistic Logic is a form of logic where conclusions are inferred from two premises. This is easier to understand with examples. I will have to note that this type of logic is rather narrow in scope and archaic. It can form logical arguments but other forms of more modern logic often supersede this. Still it [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/syllogistic-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Informal Logic</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/informal-logic/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/informal-logic/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 22:46:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=647</guid> <description><![CDATA[Characteristics associated with informal logic are development of criteria, identification of logical fallacies, development of premises, criticism, argumentation tactics and analysis of data. Identify Premise Informal logic is concerned with valid premise identification. A premise is the base which we build conclusions from. A premise is the main initial subject of a statement. Here is [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/informal-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Fallacy of Division</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/fallacy-of-division/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/fallacy-of-division/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 03:35:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=619</guid> <description><![CDATA[A fallacy of division is where someone forms a conclusion from a true aspect of a thing assuming the true thing also applies to all or some of its individuals or parts. Fallacy of Division Examples 1. Fallacy: Terrorist attacks committed by Muslims are in the name of Islam, therefore all Muslims are terrorists. Reality: [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/fallacy-of-division/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Correlation Does Not Imply Causation</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/correlation-does-not-imply-causation/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/correlation-does-not-imply-causation/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:22:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=609</guid> <description><![CDATA[Correlation does not imply causation is a fallacy where two things that correlate are mistaken to be in a cause and effect relationship. There might or might not be a causal relationship present. If there is a cause and effect relationship it might be reversed or there might be no causal relationship at all among [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/correlation-does-not-imply-causation/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Circular Cause and Consequent</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/circular-cause-and-consequent/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/circular-cause-and-consequent/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:20:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=606</guid> <description><![CDATA[Circular cause and consequence is where the consequence of a thing is also the cause. Often the mere contemplation of the consequence is what causes the consequence. Circular Cause and Consequent Example Religious fundamentalist become so infatuated with apocalyptic prophecy their fear and agitation leads to violence, destruction, and death. Worrying about doing bad on [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/circular-cause-and-consequent/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Argument from Repetition &#8211; Ad Nauseam</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argument-from-repetition-ad-nauseam/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argument-from-repetition-ad-nauseam/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:55:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=601</guid> <description><![CDATA[The argument from repetition fallacy is where an argument is repeated over and over until no further progress can be made and all points are exhausted. Normally a person will have a belief or position that does not have evidence, is blatantly false, or is fallaciously structured. They will repeat this over and over no [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argument-from-repetition-ad-nauseam/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Argument from Ignorance</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argument-from-ignorance/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argument-from-ignorance/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:36:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=599</guid> <description><![CDATA[The argument from ignorance fallacy is where one believe something to be true or false based on the absence of contradictory evidence. This often happens when someone with a claim or position tries to justify their claim because they have no better answer. The claim they believe usually has no evidence for it and is [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argument-from-ignorance/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Appeal to Law Fallacy</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/appeal-to-law-fallacy/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/appeal-to-law-fallacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:17:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=596</guid> <description><![CDATA[Appeal to Law Fallacy is where one believes a thing is either immoral or moral based on the laws or lack of laws in reference to the thing. Typically one argues against an action because it is against the law, or justifies an action simply because no law exists against it. One of the greatest [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/appeal-to-law-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Denying the Antecedent</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/denying-the-antecedent/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/denying-the-antecedent/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:05:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=521</guid> <description><![CDATA[Denying the Antecedent is where the conclusion of two statements is thought to falsify the initial truth statement. For this to happen we need an initial statement  of truth. Then we make a second statement about the initial statement that is also true. From this if we conclude that the initial statement is false we have denied [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/denying-the-antecedent/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Affirming the Consequent</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/affirming-the-consequent/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/affirming-the-consequent/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:50:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=516</guid> <description><![CDATA[Affirming the Consequent is where two statements are true and we come to a conclusion based off the two statements except the two true statements are not contingent on one another especially in the conclussions descriptor. This might sound confusing at first but it is rather easy to understand after you see an example. Affirming [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/affirming-the-consequent/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Affirming a Disjunction Fallacy</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/affirming-a-disjunction-fallacy/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/affirming-a-disjunction-fallacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 02:44:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=511</guid> <description><![CDATA[Affirming a Disjunction Fallacy is when we assume one of two statements is false just because on is proven true. Affirming a Disjunction Fallacy Example Statement 1: Bob is a Christian Statement 2: Bob hates Muslims Initial truth: Bob is a Christian Conclusion: The statement that Bob hates Muslims is false Reality: Bob really does [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/affirming-a-disjunction-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Is-Ought Fallacy</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/is-ought-fallacy/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/is-ought-fallacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 02:13:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=506</guid> <description><![CDATA[The is-ought fallacy is when someone assumes a conclusion based on an &#8216;ought&#8217; rather than an &#8216;is&#8217;. The major problem is that an &#8216;ought&#8217; is often derived from an instinct, false premise, or  cultural morality. Is-Ought Fallacy Structure Argument: A ought to be B therefore C Reality: C cannot be logically verified by the &#8216;ought&#8217; [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/is-ought-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Masked Man Fallacy</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/masked-man-fallacy/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/masked-man-fallacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:43:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=501</guid> <description><![CDATA[The masked man fallacy is where two true and logical conclusions are combined and lead to a false conclusion. Masked Man Fallacy Examples &#8220;I don&#8217;t know who the arsonist is but I know who my brother is and therefore he cannot be the arsonist.&#8221; There are two statements that could be true, not knowing who [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/masked-man-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Negative Proof Fallacy</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/negative-proof-fallacy/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/negative-proof-fallacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:26:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=498</guid> <description><![CDATA[The negative proof fallacy is where one assumes something is true if it cannot be proven false. It can also happen when one assumes that something is false if it cannot be proven true. An infinite amount of silly statements might be declared and be completely unprovable, hence we cannot assume validity in the face [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/negative-proof-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Naturalistic Fallacy</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/naturalistic-fallacy/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/naturalistic-fallacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:14:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=493</guid> <description><![CDATA[A naturalistic fallacy is any case in which someone concludes that something is a moral necessity simply because it is more natural. In this fallacy something considered natural is usually considered good, and something considered unnatural is bad. The main thing is that what is natural is assumed to be moral. This fallacy is often associated with moral arguments where [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/naturalistic-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Argument from Fallacy</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argument-from-fallacy/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argument-from-fallacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:06:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=488</guid> <description><![CDATA[The argument from fallacy is a fallacy where one discounts a conclusion merely because the logic structure for the conclusion is a fallacy. When someone structures an argument in a fallacious manner and comes to a conclusion, this conclusion might still be correct. The only problem is that we cannot know by this alone if [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/argument-from-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Appeal to Probability</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/appeal-to-probability/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/appeal-to-probability/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:54:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=483</guid> <description><![CDATA[Appealing to Probability is a logical fallacy where one assumes that a thing is inevitable simply because it is possible. Probability can be useful to find out the likelihood of future events, probability is not a fallacy in itself. Appeal to Probability is a fallacy because it is used to assume an absolute. Logic Structure A is [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/appeal-to-probability/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Red Herring Fallacy</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/red-herring-fallacy/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/red-herring-fallacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:42:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=411</guid> <description><![CDATA[A red herring fallacy is a purposeful change in topic to distract from the original topic. So if we have two people debating a particular statement one might change the topic seemingly to promote discussion but in fact it is a ploy to change the topic. Red Herring Fallacy Examples Criminality Red herring Original Argument: &#8220;We must [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/red-herring-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What is Morality and Where Does Morality Come From?</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/what-is-morality-and-where-does-morality-come-from/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/what-is-morality-and-where-does-morality-come-from/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:15:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=359</guid> <description><![CDATA[Where does morality come from? To find the answer we can first examine where people once believed morality came from. We will look at the logic structures of both ancient and modern beliefs concerning morality and try to come to a logical conclusion. We will also try to figure out what morality is or at least make [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/what-is-morality-and-where-does-morality-come-from/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>41</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>How Can We Know Something?</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/how-can-we-know-something/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/how-can-we-know-something/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 04:23:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Human Thoughts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=297</guid> <description><![CDATA[How can we really know something? It is very important to be able to determine what you can know and what you can&#8217;t. Sometimes we think we know something because it seems so obvious, yet obviousness is not a guarantee of truth. We are going to go over some things which complicate what we can know [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/human-thoughts/how-can-we-know-something/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Fallacy of Aggressive Amnesia</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/fallacy-of-aggressive-amnesia/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/fallacy-of-aggressive-amnesia/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 03:52:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=283</guid> <description><![CDATA[Fallacy of Aggressive Amnesia is an argumentation tactic whereby a person continually hops from topic to topic forgetting about the original contested premise. This is a very confusing and efficient tactic and can be quite aggressive in nature. It is similar to a red herring fallacy in that it distracts the other person from the [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/fallacy-of-aggressive-amnesia/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>How to Avoid Logical Fallacies</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/how-to-avoid-logical-fallacies/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/how-to-avoid-logical-fallacies/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 03:29:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=277</guid> <description><![CDATA[Below is a series of questions to ask yourself concerning a personal held belief. Answering these honestly will help teach how to avoid logical fallacies. Questions to Test for Logical Fallacies Am I taking the character of the person posing the statement into consideration? Am I concerned about how many people also believe the statement? [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/how-to-avoid-logical-fallacies/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Failure of Modern Logicians</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/the-failure-of-modern-logicians/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/the-failure-of-modern-logicians/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:03:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=263</guid> <description><![CDATA[I am writing an article critiquing the logic community and modern logicians. The modern logicians, people that study logic, have failed the rest of humanity and their craft. Partly for being unable to empathize with the rest of humanity and also due to economic societal structures. We logicians have a natural urge to study and [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/the-failure-of-modern-logicians/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Appeal to Popularity</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/appeal-to-popularity/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/appeal-to-popularity/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:06:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=246</guid> <description><![CDATA[Appeal to popularity is when someone tries to validate a statement based on the number of people that support or do not support the statement. Appeal to Popularity Examples Appeal to Popularity Example 1 &#8220;Look at how many people people believe in God, he obviously must exist&#8221; Just because people believe a thing to exist [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/appeal-to-popularity/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Everything Must Have a Cause</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/critical-thinking-analysis-everything-must-have-a-cause/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/critical-thinking-analysis-everything-must-have-a-cause/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:12:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=229</guid> <description><![CDATA[There is an article called Clearest Rational Argument for the Existence of a Creator proposed by a Muslim named Yusuf Mullan. He is proposing the existence of Allah, the Arabic name for god. The short summary and conclusion is at the bottom. Premises The first premise states that a movement of the hand begins to [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/critical-thinking-analysis-everything-must-have-a-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>9</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>10 Ways or Techniques to Help Improve Critical Thinking</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/10-ways-or-techniques-to-help-improve-critical-thinking/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/10-ways-or-techniques-to-help-improve-critical-thinking/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 01:38:28 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=183</guid> <description><![CDATA[Here is a list of 10 ways or techniques you can try to help improve critical thinking. Question the Evidence Establish Criteria Learn about Logic Learn about Logical Fallacies Identify the Premise Learn about Cognitive Bias Identify your Emotions Identify your Genetic Instincts Question your indoctrination Try to Prove yourself Wrong Question the Evidence Whenever [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/10-ways-or-techniques-to-help-improve-critical-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What is Critical Thinking? (Video)</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/what-is-critical-thinking-video/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/what-is-critical-thinking-video/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:47:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=173</guid> <description><![CDATA[In this lecture I describe what critical thinking is, what tools are needed for critical thinking, and what benefits you get from critical thinking. I also describe attributes and skills that help promote critical thinking. What is Critical Thinking? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2ZlRtL1X0o]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/what-is-critical-thinking-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>How is Something Created from Nothing?</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/critical-thinking-analysis-how-is-something-created-from-nothing/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/critical-thinking-analysis-how-is-something-created-from-nothing/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:01:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=152</guid> <description><![CDATA[I was asked/challenged this question &#8220;How is something created from nothing?&#8220;. To analyze this while thinking critically we have to dissect the syntax and structure of the question, define the subjects, and logically structure a conclusion. When I was asked this question there was no pre-text for the question. I do not know if this is [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/critical-thinking-analysis-how-is-something-created-from-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Genetic Fallacy</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/genetic-fallacy/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/genetic-fallacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:46:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=137</guid> <description><![CDATA[When we make a conclusion that is based on a subject&#8217;s origin and not on the actual content we make a genetic fallacy. Genetic fallacies are very common and we are all too ready to lend credibility to statements from sources that have similar beliefs and ideologies as us. Examples of Genetic Fallacy Genetic Fallacy [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/genetic-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Logical Absolutes Video</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/logical-absolutes-video/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/logical-absolutes-video/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=127</guid> <description><![CDATA[The video goes over the logical absolutes. The Law of Identity, the Law of Non-contradiction, and the Law of Excluded Middle. Here is a written article about logical absolutes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSk9zcr7yQU]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logic/logical-absolutes-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Egypt Uprising and Cognitive Bias</title><link>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/the-egypt-uprising-and-cognitive-bias/</link> <comments>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/the-egypt-uprising-and-cognitive-bias/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:52:50 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://logical-critical-thinking.com/?p=108</guid> <description><![CDATA[I had the opportunity to know the thoughts and ideas of many Egyptians before and during the uprising. My wife is an Egyptian and we have family and friends that are Egyptian in America and in Egypt. I watched and and analyzed her interactions on Facebook and noticed many peculiar reactions and behaviors from a [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/the-egypt-uprising-and-cognitive-bias/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  logical-critical-thinking.com/feed/ ) in 1.36907 seconds, on Jun 19th, 2013 at 1:14 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jun 19th, 2013 at 2:14 am UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  logical-critical-thinking.com/feed/ ) in 0.01615 seconds, on Jun 19th, 2013 at 1:54 am UTC. -->